TL;DR: Across 317,500+ queries, multi-million-token conversations, indirect prompt-injection attacks, and sandboxed coding/SQL trajectories on eleven peer-reviewed public benchmarks, krusch-stack achieves: (1) state-of-the-art cost-accuracy routing across all three major routing suites (0.7883 / 80.72% accuracy at $0.2117/1K in official RouteWorks/RouterArena GitHub CI PR #169, pending merge; #1 lowest Pareto distance 0.4269 at -83.95% cost on ACL 2026 LLMRouterBench; and #1 In-Distribution Micro AIQ = 0.7488 / 0.7695 with -72.63% cost at 98% GPT-4 quality plus #1 Leave-One-Suite-Out OOD AIQ = 0.7268 / 0.7455 across 72,980 rows on Martian RouterBench); (2) #1 Overall 91.17% (547/600 @ $24.54, 35.38s) with Gemini 4 Argon (Low) (plus 89.17% / 535/600 on Argon Medium @ $24.57 and 78.00% @ $15.76 Turn-0 Briefing-Only) on the byte-identical 0o444 frozen $0.00 SovereignMemoryStore across 14 Official gpt-5.6-sol DolphinBench runs (8,400 traces, 5 model families: +20.50 pp / +123 tasks above Official #1 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Mem0 70.67% @ $96.21 at ~4x lower cost; 96.17% Oracle@14 & 78.83% Oracle@10 open-weights sufficiency; 8 archives queued on dolphinbench.ai) AND #1 Open-Weights 54.17% (325/600) at $0.00 on Google Gemma 4 31B (52.00% No-Think) alongside 42.67% (256/600) on local Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B Wave-4 (15.7x 8B lift to 18.33%)—beating all 8 non-GPT-5.6-Luna commercial cloud baselines (MiniMax M3 + Mem0 47.83% @ $148.02 through Claude Sonnet 5 + Mem0 32.33% @ $1,830.57); (3) 0.00% Targeted Attack Success Rate (0/949, down from 19.28% unprotected) across all 1,046 episodes of ETH SpyLab AgentDojo v1.2.2 with 0.00 pp benign utility loss; (4) #1 10-task Macro NDCG@10 = 56.40% (73.88% Recall@10) across all 2,389,123 docs and 162,216 queries of ACL 2025 CoIR alongside strong open-weights retrieval on ICLR 2026 BEAM (100K–10M, 2,000/2,000 probes), RepoBench-R (47,998 Qs), and LegalBench-RAG (6,889 Qs); and (5) large deterministic $0-API 2PC harness lifts across Aider Polyglot (19.56% → 51.56% Pass@2, 2.64x), BIRD-SQL Mini-Dev (26.00% → 40.20% EX, 1.55x, 100% valid SQL across 500/500 queries), UC Berkeley BFCL v3 Live (59.88% → 66.28% Micro, 84.69% Irrelevance, -80.67% schema tokens across 2,251/2,251 queries), and krusch-stack's generalized INV-STACK-10 2PC Tool-Action Harness (10 → 0 duplicate MCP calls, +20.0 pp failure-slice recovery). Scope qualifiers matter: frontier multi-turn reasoning models still hold the 75%–88%+ coding and 65%–75%+ multi-candidate SQL ceilings over single-retry open-weights MoEs, open-weights readers (34.50%–54.17% across 14B–120B) still trail frontier reasoning on 4+-fact DolphinBench synthesis (21.33% vs. 89.33%, 4.19x), and self-judged cloud memory stacks lead aggregate BEAM E2E QA. All 36 raw JSON audit logs and deterministic verifiers are public on Hugging Face.
0.7883 · 0.7695
#1 RouterArena CI, #1 ACL LLMRouterBench (0.4269) & #1 Martian RouterBench AIQ
0.00% ASR · 56.40%
AgentDojo 1,046-Ep Defense (from 19.28%) & #1 ACL 2025 CoIR 10-Task NDCG@10
#1 91.17% · 51.56%
#1 DolphinBench ($24.54 Argon / 54.17% $0 Gemma 4) & 2.64x Polyglot
73 / 73 Gates
Loopback Air-Gap, Proxy/AST Oracle Traps & 36 SHA-256 Raw Audit Logs

1. Condensed 6-Pillar External Scorecard (11 Suites)

Rather than inventing custom micro-benchmarks or grading models with themselves, we ran each subsystem of krusch-stack against eleven established academic and industry benchmarks inside an isolated 96 GB NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (sm_120) clean-room VM and local 1024d snowflake-arctic-embed2 loopback (zero outbound cloud API calls on every local open-weights inference run; 14-run, 5-family reader & Thinking × Search ablation on byte-identical 0o444 SQLite stores & official upstream gpt-5.6-sol rubric judge on DolphinBench).

Pillar & Repo External Benchmark & Scale Verified Sovereign Result External Stack / Leaderboard Context
Cascade Router
krusch-cascade-router
RouterArena (8,400 Qs + 420 rob.)
ACL 2026 LLMRouterBench (12,566 Qs × 13 LLMs)
Martian RouterBench (36,497 0-shot + 36,483 5-shot × 11 LLMs)
0.7883 RouterArena CI (80.72% Acc @ $0.2117/1K)
0.4269 #1 Pareto (-83.95% cost, 1.27ms)
0.7488 / 0.7695 #1 ID AIQ (-72.63% @ 98% GPT-4) & 0.7268 / 0.7455 #1 OOD AIQ
-48.0% TTFT live SSE · 51.67% Pass@2
Tops Paix2 (0.7763), KT-ModelRouter (0.7628), vLLM-SR (0.7486), Azure-Model-Router (0.7042), Martian ($4.83/1K), NotDiamond ($4.10/1K), RouteLLM (25.25% vs. 8.75% unseen ARC-AGI) & KNN/SVM/MLP/ZeroRouter across ID + Leave-One-Suite-Out OOD.
Working Memory
krusch-context-mcp (v2.0.0)
ICLR 2026 BEAM
100 chats (~178.34M tok), 2,000/2,000 probes across 100K, 500K, 1M, 10M in ~8K budget
92.58% (100K) & 93.00% (10M IE) recall
0% E2E drop 100K → 1M (70.60% → 72.86%)
92.50% / 98.13% 100K CR (Stock / QLoRA)
Beats pure dense 8K across all 4/4 splits; beats cloud past.dev (gpt-5.6-luna) on Contradiction Resolution (4/4 splits), 10M IE (70.00% vs. 68.75%) & 10M MSR (29.54% / 38.33% vs. 28.17%); trails cloud on overall E2E (see §3).
Agentic Memory & Execution
SovereignMemoryStore + Gemini 4 Argon, Gemma 4 31B, Wave-4 QLoRA+DPO & INV-STACK-10 2PC
Official DolphinBench (14 × 600 = 8,400 traces)
5 model families, 0o444 frozen SQLite, official gpt-5.6-sol judge (8 queued · UUID c047b063-…, 29389157-… & 288671ad-…)
#1 Overall 91.17% (547/600) Argon Low @ $24.54 (35.38s; 89.17% Medium; 78.00% Turn-0 @ $15.76)
#1 Open-Weights 54.17% (325/600) Gemma 4 31B @ $0.00 (52.00% No-Think)
42.67% 30B Wave-4 · 39.50% 120B · 35.33% 32B · 34.50% 14B · 18.33% 8B (15.7x)
+20.50 pp (+123 tasks) above #1 Mem0 (70.67% @ $96.21) at ~4x lower cost (96.17% Oracle@14, 78.83% Oracle@10 open-weights, 4.19x LBF=4+); $0.00 Gemma 4 31B (#6 Overall) beats all 8 non-GPT-5.6-Luna cloud stacks (MiniMax M3 + Mem0 47.83% @ $148.02 to Claude Sonnet 5 + Mem0 32.33% @ $1,830.57); INV-STACK-10 2PC cuts dup MCP calls 10 → 0 (+20.0 pp; see §3).
Code AST & Git
krusch-git (v1.2.3)
ACL 2025 CoIR (10/10 Tasks) (2,389,123 docs, 162,216 Qs)
RepoBench-R (ICLR 2024) (47,998 Py & Java Qs across 8 splits; 0 LLM judges)
56.40% #1 CoIR Macro NDCG@10 (73.88% R@10, 50.94% MRR@10)
19.12% RepoBench Macro Acc@1 · 68.58% Acc@5 (31.33% Py / 27.45% Java cfr Easy)
+7.42 pp NDCG@10 over CoIR BM25 (48.98%) & exceeds all 10 published CoIR Table 3 512-tok baselines incl. Voyage-Code-002 (56.26%) & E5-Mistral 7B (55.18%; see §3); +21.8% Acc@1 over pure dense on RepoBench-R, beating CodeBERT & UniXcoder.
Evidentiary Span RAG
KruschNexus (v0.2.6)
LegalBench-RAG
714 docs, 6,889 full / 776 mini character-exact span queries (0 LLM judges)
26.74% Full Macro F1 (k=1)
25.81% F1 / 44.72% R (k=2) · 47.71% R@6
33.95% MAUD Recall@2
2.29x (+128.5%) Macro F1 over fixed 160-tok dense chunks (11.70%) using the same embedder; MAUD Recall@2 (33.95%) beats published OpenAI text-embedding-3-large + Cohere Rerank Recall@64 (28.28%).
2PC Code & SQL Harness
krusch-coding-harness
Aider Polyglot (225/225) (6 languages, un-skipped tests)
BIRD-SQL Mini-Dev (500/500) (11 SQLite DBs; 0 LLM judges)
Polyglot: 19.56% → 51.56% Pass@2 (72 healed)
BIRD-SQL: 26.00% → 40.20% EX (35.75% R-VES, 100.00% valid SQL, 13 healed)
2.64x (+32.00 pp) coding lift tying cloud Claude 3.5 Sonnet (51.6%) & beating GPT-4o (23.1%) + 1.55x (+14.20 pp) SQL lift (5.00x on toxicology, 50.00% moderate) at $0 API cost; trails multi-turn frontier reasoning (see §3).
MCP Hub & Security Shield
krusch-stack
ETH SpyLab AgentDojo (v1.2.2) (1,046 eps: 97 benign + 949 attacks)
UC Berkeley BFCL v3 Live (2,251/2,251 across all 6/6 splits in 64-tool hub)
AgentDojo: 19.28% → 0.00% ASR (0/949), 61.86% / 69.07% Benign (83 floor blocks)
BFCL v3: 59.88% → 66.28% Micro, 84.69% Irrel., -80.67% schema tok
Eliminates all 183 indirect prompt-injection compromises on raw gpt-oss:120b (57.14% slack, 52.78% banking) with 0.00 pp benign loss; cuts 64-tool MCP schema tokens from 7,894 → 1,526 tok/turn while lifting abstention +17.46 pp & healing 29 schema calls.

2. How the Stack Compares Against Three Architecture Archetypes

A. vs. Standard Open-Source "Wrapper" Stacks

Typical open-source agent stacks glue LangChain or LlamaIndex splitters (fixed 500-token windows) to a single vector store, stuff every MCP tool schema into the system prompt, pass raw untrusted tool outputs straight back into the model, and allow coding or SQL agents to execute unverified 1-shot generations. Our controlled ablations isolate why each of those defaults breaks at scale:

B. vs. Commercial Cloud Router, Memory, Code & Legal Stacks

C. Clean-Room Auditability vs. Unverified Leaderboard Claims

Every run in our benchmark archive passes 73 / 73 automated integrity gates: (1) loopback air-gap verification (127.0.0.1:11434, cloud API keys unset during sovereign model inference), (2) runtime JavaScript Proxy traps, opaque RPC session tokens, frozen 0o444 pre-populated SQLite memory stores on DolphinBench, and Python pre-eval column stripping on ground-truth answer/SQL/qrel/injection fields that block oracle access before inference, (3) RestrictedUnpickler + SafeZipExtractor guards, read-only DatabaseSync SQL enforcement, full-corpus 2,389,123-doc anti-shrinkage checks, and zero hardcoded attacker literals on AgentDojo, (4) mandatory Exercism test un-skipping + pristine test SHA-256 checks, and (5) zero LLM self-judging (deterministic compiler, SQL set-equivalence, AST bijection, and math verifiers on 9 benchmarks; dual cross-family open-weights referees on BEAM; official gpt-5.6-sol rubric judge on DolphinBench).

3. Where Frontier Cloud Stacks Still Beat Us (Honest Gaps & Open PRs)

Why We Leave the Caveats In: Open-weights systems engineering is strongest when its boundaries are explicit. Below are the exact areas where frontier cloud models still hold a clear margin, where benchmark protocol differences or artifacts matter, and which upstream leaderboard pull requests remain pending merge.

4. Raw Artifacts & 60-Second Cryptographic Verification

Every raw per-query JSON audit log (36 raw JSON audit logs, SHA-256 pinned, including all 14 dolphinbench_600 official gpt-5.6-sol runs / 8,400 traces) and 14 Hugging Face Dataset Viewer splits are published under CC-BY-4.0 at krush420/sovereign-g4-benchmarks, alongside the interactive Pareto & trajectory explorer at krush420/sovereign-router-arena and repository-level reproduction docs in kruschdev/krusch-stack.

# Clone the raw clean-room audit logs & verify all SHA-256 digests in <60s
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/krush420/sovereign-g4-benchmarks
cd sovereign-g4-benchmarks

python3 -c '
import hashlib, json, pathlib
rows = [json.loads(l) for l in pathlib.Path("data/scorecard_summary.jsonl").read_text().splitlines()]
for r in rows:
    if r["audit_log_file"].startswith("raw_audit_logs/"):
        digest = hashlib.sha256(pathlib.Path(r["audit_log_file"]).read_bytes()).hexdigest()
        assert digest == r["audit_log_sha256"], f"Mismatch: {r[\"audit_log_file\"]}"
        print("VERIFIED:", r["audit_log_file"], digest[:16])
'

Inspect the Raw Logs or Install KruschStack Locally

npx krusch-stack init --defer-tools · 73/73 SHA-256 Clean-Room Gates · MIT Licensed

🤗 HF Raw Audit Logs → #1 DolphinBench Return on Memory → GitHub: krusch-stack → 2026 Architecture Blueprint →