Technical TL;DR: Agent memory papers usually change the index, prompt scaffold, and LLM at the same time—obscuring whether gains come from better retrieval, active reasoning, or cleaner tool execution. Across 9 local ablation runs (5,535 verified traces) and 14 official openai/gpt-5.6-sol 600-task archives (8,400 traces across 5 model families) on Official DolphinBench (600 multi-app MCP tasks + 15 memory_enabled=False counterfactuals; 13,539 sessions / 1,500,265 o200k_base tokens ingested in 153.4s with 0 LLM calls), we moved one axis per run against byte-identical 0o444 SQLite stores—separating zero-LLM Raw-RAG memory (+12.50 pp SWE), dense general-domain post-training (Google Gemma 4 31B 54.17% @ $0.00 vs. code-only Qwen2.5-32B 35.33%), Wave-4 role-neutral QLoRA+DPO (42.67% 30B, 15.7x 8B), krusch-stack 2PC action guardrails (-100% duplicate MCP calls), and frontier reasoning (Gemini 4 Argon Low 91.17% #1 Overall @ $24.54).
5,535 + 8,400 Traces
9 Controlled Local Ablations + 14 Official gpt-5.6-sol 600-Task Archives Across 5 Model Families
54.17% @ $0.00 (#1 Open)
Google Gemma 4 31B Dense Beats All 8 Non-Luna Cloud Stacks (Up to $1,830.57) & +18.83 pp vs. Coder-32B
+12.50 pp Alex · +10.50 pp Riley
SovereignMemoryStore vs. Raw snowflake-arctic-embed2 Cosine on Fixed gpt-oss:120b (48.50% → 55.83%)
91.17% #1 · -100% Dup Calls
Gemini 4 Argon Low ($24.54) · krusch-stack 2PC Harness (+20.0 pp Slice Lift) · 15.7x 8B Edge Lift

1. Why DolphinBench Breaks Toy Haystacks & Our 5-Gate Clean-Room

Toy needle-in-a-haystack benchmarks hide a self-contained fact inside filler text and query the exact same nouns. Real workspace agents fail on stateful action execution under evolving rules. Released by Mem0 (mem0ai/dolphinbench), DolphinBench tests 600 live mock_mcp workspace tasks across 13,539 chronological sessions (1,500,265 o200k_base tokens) and three personas—Morgan (200 Founder/Ops tasks), Alex (200 Staff SWE tasks with 18 KB incident logs and deprecated flags), and Riley (200 Growth PM tasks)—plus 15 pure-deterministic counterfactuals. Passing requires retrieving standing policies that share zero nouns with today's terse prompt, resolving [Date: YYYY-MM-DD] temporal supersession, chaining list_* state lookups before mutating records, and withholding prohibited side effects.

Every run across our 9 × 615 = 5,535-trace local ablation suite and our 14 × 600 = 8,400-trace official openai/gpt-5.6-sol scoreboard is enforced by verify_zero_leakage.py across five gates:

  1. Zero-LLM 0o444 SQLite Immutability: Ingests all 13,539 sessions in 153.4s with 0 LLM calls ($0.00), truncates WAL, applies chmod 0o444 + file:...?mode=ro URIs, and verifies pre/post SHA-256 digests across every 600-task run.
  2. Static AST Clean-Room Scan: Verifies zero imports from grading rubrics, zero persona proper nouns, and zero test-ID branching.
  3. Official 5-Method BenchmarkHarness Replay: Passes upstream python -m harness.export_submission --release upstream --check offline with 0 errors across all 14 archives.
  4. Mechanical Check Suite (599 Tasks / 1,310 Assertions): Audits deterministic tool arguments and mock_mcp state mutations without an LLM judge.
  5. Counterfactual Causality Gate (15 Tasks, memory_enabled=True vs. False): Confirms causal lift from retrieved memory (+53.3 pp on both 30B and 120B).
Frozen 0o444 SQLite & Harness SHA-256 Digests (8 Clean-Room Artifacts)
Artifact / Frozen Store Role & Scale Verified SHA-256 Digest
upstream/ Unmodified mem0ai/dolphinbench release (600 tasks, 13,539 sessions) 6da84edd86670a2c91476ac732bcaf07e4e7f210c3fee3aed225c54b104a82df
sovereign_memory.py Zero-LLM SovereignMemoryStore (0o444 SQLite, 256/32 Raw-RAG + 4-Way RRF) 16700bc047b0a0e88d3e8b04e55f8513000e922947dd1a186fefba7ab65769bd
sovereign_harness.py Official 5-method BenchmarkHarness MCP adapter 4531e3efa4e110e335078b10cc7a83fe84ca2955ad7cc74350fd1e496c0eee5f
sovereign_harness_krusch_stack.py Clean-room Tier 3 krusch-stack 2PC Action Harness subclass (INV-STACK-10, 6/6 tests) 3c4929cb725ecb5f887c1fc74b1cd93e000684cd5df15fb20ca7d87d4b4bcf8b
vanilla_snowflake_harness.py Pure raw-turn single-query 1024d snowflake-arctic-embed2 cosine baseline a9f3c50992d0ae30a445fa0883c362e0466ceb6de146b7a3abea9691d8e8ca2f
morgan.sqlite (0o444) 3,400 turns · 2,547 Raw-RAG windows · 44.7 MB · 0 LLM calls f3f8fbf550a4ef3f75ed752e5e1929205720898616add35e93a865e2dd0bcc04
alex.sqlite (0o444) 5,011 turns · 2,691 Raw-RAG windows · 53.2 MB · 0 LLM calls 7c3fec7c869625db9df5decf74471d5f14507eae2ebf8d64a69f7e86d7ccba04
riley.sqlite (0o444) 5,128 turns · 2,697 Raw-RAG windows · 53.6 MB · 0 LLM calls b9a59a1b1cdb2a09e4930516671829152ec0b24fd2cbebcc114961413c0e7266

2. Axis A: Zero-LLM Hybrid Memory vs. Raw Cosine (+12.50 pp SWE)

Cloud memory layers run paid LLM extraction over every message during ingestion, whereas naive vector RAG embeds whole turns and fetches top-k cosine neighbors. Holding Stock gpt-oss:120b, 1024d snowflake-arctic-embed2, the 4,200-token budget, and judges fixed, swapping single-query cosine (VanillaSnowflakeHarness) for SovereignMemoryStore lifts overall pass rate from 48.50% (291/600) → 55.83% (335/600, +7.33 pp).

# sovereign_memory.py — Read-only 0o444 URI guard + 4-Way Hybrid RRF + Raw-RAG window projection
def retrieve_persona_briefing(path: Path, cache: FrozenCache, query: str, q_vec: list[float], rrf_k: int = 60):
    if (path.stat().st_mode & 0o222) != 0:
        raise PermissionError(f"Refusing benchmark retrieval on writable SQLite store: {path}")

    fts_expr = build_fts5_or_query(query)  # Quoted Porter-stemmed token OR-clause
    conn = sqlite3.connect(f"file:{path}?mode=ro", uri=True, timeout=10.0)
    try:
        top_turn_bm25 = [int(r[0]) for r in conn.execute(
            "SELECT rowid - 1 FROM turns_fts WHERE turns_fts MATCH ? ORDER BY bm25(turns_fts) ASC LIMIT 128",
            (fts_expr,),
        ).fetchall()]
        top_win_bm25 = [int(r[0]) for r in conn.execute(
            "SELECT rowid - 1 FROM windows_fts WHERE windows_fts MATCH ? ORDER BY bm25(windows_fts) ASC LIMIT 128",
            (fts_expr,),
        ).fetchall()]
    finally:
        conn.close()

    # 4-Way RRF: Turn-Dense (1.0) + Turn-BM25 (1.15) + Win-Dense (0.85) + Win-BM25 (0.95)
    turn_rrf: dict[int, float] = {}
    for rank, (t_idx, _) in enumerate(top_turn_dense):
        turn_rrf[t_idx] = turn_rrf.get(t_idx, 0.0) + 1.00 / (rrf_k + rank + 1)
    for rank, t_idx in enumerate(top_turn_bm25):
        turn_rrf[t_idx] = turn_rrf.get(t_idx, 0.0) + 1.15 / (rrf_k + rank + 1)
    for rank, (w_idx, _) in enumerate(top_win_dense):
        for t_idx in cache.windows[w_idx]["turn_indices"]:
            turn_rrf[t_idx] = turn_rrf.get(t_idx, 0.0) + 0.85 / (rrf_k + rank + 1)
    for rank, w_idx in enumerate(top_win_bm25):
        for t_idx in cache.windows[w_idx]["turn_indices"]:
            turn_rrf[t_idx] = turn_rrf.get(t_idx, 0.0) + 0.95 / (rrf_k + rank + 1)
    # Cross-encoder rerank + salience boost -> knapsack-pack 4,200 tokens in chronological order.

3. Axis B: Parameter Scale Phase Transition (8B → 30B MoE → 120B MoE)

With retrieval frozen, every model evaluated on SovereignMemoryStore receives the byte-identical 4,200-token turn-1 briefing across all 600 tasks, isolating parameter scale across our 6-run Phase-1 matrix (3,690 traces across Node-02 Dual RTX 2080 Ti 22 GB NVLink, Node-01 Dual RTX 3060 24 GB, and 96 GB Blackwell G4 burst):

Run Agent Model & Memory Overall (Strict / Referee) Morgan / Alex / Riley (Strict) Mechanical Gate (599 / 1,310) Pure Det. (15) Latency
Run 1 gpt-oss:120b Stock + Sovereign (G4) 55.83% (335) / 76.17% 64.0% / 44.5% / 59.0% 83.14% / 79.92% 10/15 vs 2/15 9.62s
Run 2 gpt-oss:120b Stock + Vanilla Cosine (G4) 48.50% (291) / 75.17% 65.0% / 32.0% / 48.5% 82.80% / 81.22% 9/15 vs 1/15 8.59s
Run 3 gpt-oss-sre:120b Wave-3 Auditor + Sovereign 36.50% (219) / 51.00% 40.5% / 28.0% / 41.0% 55.59% / 59.47% 8/15 vs 0/15 15.52s
Run 4 qwen3-coder-30b-moe Wave-3 + Sovereign (Node-02) 53.00% (318) / 79.17% 62.0% / 43.0% / 54.0% 88.15% / 84.50% 9/15 vs 1/15 16.33s
Run 5 qwen3-coder-30b-moe:base Stock + Sovereign (Node-02) 50.50% (303) / 80.33% (hermes3) 63.0% / 38.5% / 50.0% 88.81% / 85.11% 9/15 vs 1/15 17.11s
Run 6 hermes3:latest 8B Q4_0 Stock + Sovereign (Node-02) 1.17% (7) / 4.50% (qwen3-30b) 1.5% / 0.0% / 2.0% 66.44% / 57.25% 0/15 vs 1/15 5.96s

Stock hermes3:latest (8B Q4_0) did not fail on JSON tool syntax—it emitted valid tool calls on 593/600 tasks (66.44% mechanical task gate), yet collapsed to 4.50% (0/15 pure deterministic) when binding multiple policy constraints simultaneously. Stepping up to local Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B (only 3.3B active parameters on Dual RTX 2080 Ti at $0.00) crosses that reasoning threshold immediately, hitting 80.33% under hermes3 and a suite-high 88.81% (532/599) mechanical compliance.

4. Axis C: Wave-3 Refusal Postmortem → Wave-4 Unified QLoRA + DPO

Our most useful discovery came from Run 3's failure, where applying our Wave-3 SRE Code-Auditor adapter to gpt-oss:120b dropped generalist accuracy from 55.83% → 36.50%, alongside a hidden Ollama template bug on 8B:

{{- if .Tools }}
<|im_start|>system
You are a function calling AI model... <tools>{{ .Tools }}</tools><|im_end>
{{- else if .System }}   <-- BUG: .System is silently dropped whenever .Tools is non-empty!
<|im_start|>system
{{ .System }}<|im_end>
{{- end }}
The Wave-4 Unified Fix (18,131 Zero-Leak SFT + DPO Rows Across 7 Splits): We stripped persona prompts out of every Modelfile so weights stay role-neutral, repaired the Hermes-3 template so {{ .System }} and <tools> render together cleanly, and expanded krush420/sovereign-code-audit-sft to 18,131 Zero-Leak SFT + DPO rows across 7 splits—pairing code-audit calibration with clean-room list_*-before-write discovery chains, temporal-supersession overrides, and action-vs-refusal DPO pairs across 8B (BF16), 30B, and 120B.

5. Official 14-Run openai/gpt-5.6-sol Scoreboard (8,400 Traces · 8 Queued)

Building on our 9-run Wave-3/Wave-4 local ablation (5,535 verified traces), we evaluated 14 clean-room 600-task configurations (8,400 official traces across 5 model families: Google Gemini, Google Gemma 4, Alibaba Qwen, OpenAI GPT-OSS, and Nous Hermes) on the byte-identical frozen 0o444 SovereignMemoryStore SQLite checkpoints. Every archive was graded with the official openai/gpt-5.6-sol (reasoning_effort="medium") judge, verified offline with 0 errors via harness.export_submission --check (14/14 passed), and 8 flagship archives are queued on dolphinbench.ai alongside 6 clean-room 2×2 search/thinking and dense-vs-MoE scaling controls:

Rank / Tier (gpt-5.6-sol) Configuration (5 Model Families + Public Cloud Baselines) Overall (600) Morgan / Alex / Riley Mech. Checks USD Cost Latency
Sovereign Frontier #1 Gemini 4 Argon (Low, Full Mem) + SovereignMemoryStore (Paper #27) 91.17% (547) 95.5% / 89.5% / 88.5% 92.22% $24.54 35.38s
Sovereign Frontier #2 Gemini 4 Argon (Medium, Full Mem) + SovereignMemoryStore 89.17% (535) 92.0% / 87.0% / 88.5% 89.77% $24.57 55.27s
Sovereign (2×2 Briefing Med) Gemini 4 Argon (Medium, Turn-0 Briefing-Only) + SovereignMemoryStore 79.17% (475) 86.0% / 77.5% / 74.0% 80.33% $16.91 26.93s
Sovereign (2×2 Briefing Low) Gemini 4 Argon (Low, Turn-0 Briefing-Only) + SovereignMemoryStore 78.00% (468) 82.5% / 77.5% / 74.0% 79.00% $15.76 21.49s
Official #1 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Mem0 70.67% (424) 78.0% / 66.0% / 68.0% — $96.21 37.69s
Official #2 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Hindsight 69.50% (417) 72.0% / 63.5% / 73.0% — $84.65 55.31s
Official #3 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Honcho 68.50% (411) 72.0% / 60.0% / 73.5% — $142.85 44.66s
Official #4 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Built-in 65.67% (394) 65.5% / 55.5% / 76.0% — $61.48 44.35s
Official #5 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Supermemory 59.17% (355) 69.0% / 49.0% / 59.5% — $345.64 52.68s
Sovereign Open-Weights #1 Google Gemma 4 31B Dense (Thinking ON) + SovereignMemoryStore (Apache-2.0) 54.17% (325) 72.0% / 47.5% / 43.0% 58.11%* $0.00 41.02s
Sovereign Open-Weights #2 Google Gemma 4 31B Dense (Thinking OFF) + SovereignMemoryStore 52.00% (312) 70.5% / 43.5% / 42.0% 54.97%* $0.00 42.02s
Official #6 Hermes + MiniMax M3 + Mem0 47.83% (287) 54.0% / 41.0% / 48.5% — $148.02 46.95s
Official #7 Hermes + MiniMax M3 + Honcho 47.33% (284) 54.0% / 45.5% / 42.5% — $211.85 80.33s
Sovereign (30B Wave-4) Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B Wave-4 + SovereignMemoryStore (Node-02 2x 2080 Ti) 42.67% (256) 55.5% / 35.0% / 37.5% 43.93%* (85.73%) $0.00 15.72s
Sovereign (30B Stock) Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B Stock + SovereignMemoryStore 42.00% (252) 58.5% / 35.5% / 32.0% 42.34%* (85.11%) $0.00 17.11s
Official #8 Hermes + MiniMax M3 + Hindsight 41.00% (246) 54.5% / 46.5% / 22.0% — $158.33 144.28s
Sovereign (120B Wave-4) gpt-oss:120b Wave-4 + SovereignMemoryStore 39.50% (237) 54.5% / 31.5% / 32.5% 39.28%* (78.85%) $0.00 16.83s
Sovereign (120B Stock) gpt-oss:120b Stock + SovereignMemoryStore 39.17% (235) 51.0% / 35.0% / 31.5% 38.72%* (79.92%) $0.00 9.62s
Sovereign (80B Stock MoE) Qwen3-Coder-Next-80B (3.0B / 79.7B MoE) + SovereignMemoryStore 38.50% (231) 52.0% / 34.0% / 29.5% 39.70%* $0.00 23.22s
Official #9 Claude Code + Claude Sonnet 5 + Honcho 35.83% (215) 46.5% / 31.5% / 29.5% — $1,565.82 37.92s
Sovereign (32B Dense Coder) Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Dense Stock + SovereignMemoryStore 35.33% (212) 48.5% / 29.5% / 28.0% 39.34%* $0.00 22.49s
Sovereign (14B Dense Gen.) Nous Hermes-4-14B Dense Stock + SovereignMemoryStore 34.50% (207) 49.5% / 28.5% / 25.5% 36.66%* $0.00 62.46s
Official #10 Claude Code + Claude Sonnet 5 + Mem0 32.33% (194) 40.5% / 36.0% / 20.5% — $1,830.57 42.30s
Official #11 / #12 MiniMax M3 + Built-in (26.50%, $107.03) · Claude Sonnet 5 + Built-in (26.33%) 26.33–26.50% 28.0–34.5% / 22.5–23.5% / 21.0–29.0% — $107–$1,133 32–51s
Official #13 Hermes + MiniMax M3 + Supermemory 20.00% (120) 22.5% (45) / 18.5% / 19.0% — $497.70 137.52s
Sovereign (8B Wave-4) Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B Q4_0 Wave-4 + SovereignMemoryStore 18.33% (110) 26.0% (52) / 14.5% / 14.5% 17.98%* (64.20%) $0.00 11.30s

*Official grades_official_gpt56_sol evaluates 1,324–1,468 strict state/field sub-checks per run (parentheses show our zero-LLM 1,310-check inner-loop tool-argument gate).

Cryptographic Ledger of All 14 Official Submission Archives (8 Queued on dolphinbench.ai + 6 Clean-Room Controls)
Submission Archive & Size Official Score Queued UUID / Clean-Room Role Archive SHA-256 Digest
sovereign_gemini_4_argon_low.zip (8.396 MiB) 547/600 (91.17%, #1 Overall) c047b063-822c-49fb-8b36-27c3763d6ca7 80a199a60aef65f0d963d0402a2e3b0af99b82ed63e2f422001234b6ed770f0b
sovereign_gemini_4_argon.zip (8.350 MiB) 535/600 (89.17%) 29389157-b01b-42b5-8193-17d9a496f580 9a7fa41fb3d1cf5f71f0c3cf74a0c97f8f39d50e26a7dd484c323f7719ecb7a0
sovereign_gemini_4_argon_briefing_only.zip (6.565 MiB) 475/600 (79.17%) 2×2 Turn-0 Briefing Control (Med) ccc65b321510a26ae8ed01cc35c98e77c5e90590f9325e84e05eba9ec4477699
sovereign_gemini_4_argon_low_briefing_only.zip (6.511 MiB) 468/600 (78.00%) 2×2 Turn-0 Briefing Control (Low) b7dff8f15b7ed2dbbced14cbb853eda7716b85901f22207af01d74d7cb7cca6b
sovereign_gemma4_31b_stock.zip (10.782 MiB) 325/600 (54.17%, #1 Open-Weights) 288671ad-afe0-40a3-93af-b834c9bbd306 (#1 Open-Weights · $0.00) 2a23c2a023473a6642f5a61f1d99ff569f3d50ac53e60576f8195eef659c254b
sovereign_gemma4_31b_nothink_stock.zip (10.981 MiB) 312/600 (52.00%) Clean-Room Thinking-OFF Control ($0.00) 29d4b6d76bbf0abbfc0ed06d0a16dc847d1814bcf8bc2908c450ed8ab2dffdbf
sovereign_qwen3_coder_30b_wave4_qlora.zip (9.006 MiB) 256/600 (42.67%) fd45f16c-fd3c-471c-b93d-413f61f1dbcf d0b6423d3a9c3cba22c63d936fb13c00b3e39fb1afa672e2bfd50781bbde692e
sovereign_qwen3_coder_30b_stock.zip (9.125 MiB) 252/600 (42.00%) 9cac5ab1-ecba-40a6-ad84-55ec2d67bfce 8dea5dac9006f77dc98f3dc598bbc7fd490299c85d7667c5797a635dc3ad222a
sovereign_gpt_oss_120b_wave4_qlora.zip (6.420 MiB) 237/600 (39.50%) 83a4c085-0e44-42af-a625-b496e63c8949 4cacf215c6b7c7cb4ec223868646dac45cfdce038a78f4be174f290efbd2d6a2
sovereign_gpt_oss_120b_stock.zip (6.073 MiB) 235/600 (39.17%) 7b5073fd-e1d9-458b-a607-7c55f76b6df1 3a0b4577db4a8179abdffc00b7831ac3e84f3a864930df892a2c175d19bcf69b
sovereign_qwen3_coder_next_80b_stock.zip (7.354 MiB) 231/600 (38.50%) Clean-Room 80B MoE Scale Control 283871b696ea55a6ac351a3cbfe19aa33c46d8f884bd7adb29156dad03793cb9
sovereign_qwen25_coder_32b_stock.zip (5.445 MiB) 212/600 (35.33%) Clean-Room 32B Dense Coder Control 297cca2999351d98aae786acfac2da38b5806e9280553c2cb080febffa547aa4
sovereign_hermes4_14b_stock.zip (8.091 MiB) 207/600 (34.50%) Clean-Room 14B Dense Generalist Control b3b4e5e106daef3203e4ed6f19da20699450fb5277df76fb76654773d6c41479
sovereign_hermes3_8b_wave4_qlora.zip (5.424 MiB) 110/600 (18.33%) 19552654-be39-4fe0-8043-a49158582356 24ae1fde4ef51f11ed2e72e546481a4205438c4eba3c4afcaffe268726b9e422

6. 5-Family Synthesis: Gemma 4 31B, Frontier Argon 91.17% & 2PC Action Guardrails

Three Orthogonal Bottlenecks Behind Agentic Memory: Expanding from 9 local ablation runs to 14 official gpt-5.6-sol archives (8,400 traces across 5 model families) on the exact same 0o444 SQLite stores separates post-training specialization, test-time reasoning scale, and deterministic tool-loop governance.

6.1 What Kind of Local Model Excels at Multi-App Agentic Memory? (Gemma 4 31B 54.17% vs. Coder-32B 35.33%)

Before testing dense non-coder models, it looked plausible that open-weights agents hit a hard ~42% wall on DolphinBench. Evaluating Apache-2.0 Google Gemma 4 31B (30.7B 100% active dense Q4_K_M) disproved that hypothesis immediately: stock Gemma 4 31B reaches 54.17% (325/600) with native <|thought|> thinking enabled and 52.00% (312/600) with thinking disabled (4.9x fewer output tokens: 174,226 vs. 853,604; Oracle@2 = 61.50% [369/600]) at $0.00 total cost—beating all 8 non-GPT-5.6-Luna commercial cloud baselines on the official leaderboard up to $1,830.57 (ranking #6 vs. all 13 public cloud stacks) and tying GPT 5.6 Luna + Hindsight/Honcho (144/200 = 72.0%) on Morgan.

Holding active parameter count fixed near ~31B dense, general-domain multi-app tool post-training (Gemma 4 31B: 54.17%) outperforms code-specialized Qwen2.5-Coder-32B (35.33%, 212/600, only 0.03 memory calls/task) by +18.83 pp (+113 tasks, McNemar p = 1.35 × 10⁻¹⁶) and sparse 3.3B-active Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B Wave-4 (42.67%, 256/600) by +11.50 pp (+69 tasks, p = 4.96 × 10⁻⁷). Even 14.8B dense generalist Nous Hermes-4-14B (34.50%, 207/600, 1.99 memory calls/task) statistically ties 2.2x-larger Qwen2.5-Coder-32B (p = 0.729) and beats Claude Sonnet 5 + Mem0 (32.33% @ $1,830.57)—confirming that workplace assistants need dense general-domain social/calendar/email post-training alongside coder backbones.

6.2 Frontier Upper Bound & Retrieval-Sufficiency Proof (Argon Low 91.17% · Oracle@14 = 96.17% · Oracle@10 = 78.83%)

Pairing the byte-identical 0o444 frozen SovereignMemoryStore with Gemini 4 Argon (Low Thinking) (1.84 memory calls/task) achieves 91.17% (547/600, #1 Overall) at $24.54 total cost and 35.38s median latency—beating Official #1 Hermes + GPT 5.6 Luna + Mem0 (70.67% @ $96.21) by +20.50 pp (+123 tasks) at ~3.9x lower cost (Argon Medium scores 89.17% / 535/600 @ $24.57). Across our 2×2 Argon factorial (2,400 traces), Thinking × Agentic Search exhibits a statistically significant interaction (ΔΔ = +3.17 pp, 95% CI [+0.27, +6.06], p = 0.0320): lighter per-turn thinking avoids over-committing to partial Turn-0 context and reinvests budget into iterative search_persona_memory calls (+13.17 pp lift on Argon Low vs. +10.00 pp on Medium), while even Turn-0 Briefing-Only Argon Low (78.00% @ $15.76) beats #1 Mem0 by +7.33 pp at 6.1x lower cost.

Across all 14 runs, union pass rate reaches Oracle@14 = 96.17% (577/600)—and Oracle@10 = 78.83% (473/600) across $0.00 open-weights runs alone (+8.17 pp above #1 Mem0!), with a 4.19x superlinear multiplier at compositional depth LBF=4+ (89.33% [67/75] vs. 21.33% [16/75] on 30B Stock & Gemma 4 31B) and flatter corpus-entropy decay (-3.50 pp Argon Med / -7.00 pp Argon Low vs. -10.00 pp Morgan → Riley [78.0% → 68.0%] and -12.00 pp Morgan → Alex [78.0% → 66.0%] on Mem0). See companion Paper #27 (Return on Memory) for the full 4-chart scaling derivation and @krusch/toolkit/cascade for L1 (8B) → L2 (Gemma 4 31B / 30B @ $0.00) → L3 (Argon Low) routing.

6.3 Closing Execution Faults Without Retraining (krusch-stack INV-STACK-10 2PC Action Harness & Tradeoffs)

7. Reproducibility, Compute Ledger & Public Artifacts

# 1. Offline unit suites (including 6/6 krusch-stack 2PC harness tests) & 5-gate clean-room AST verifier
.venv/bin/python -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test_*.py" -v && .venv/bin/python verify_zero_leakage.py --static-only

# 2. Local 600-task run or clean-room Tier 3 krusch-stack 2PC Action Harness adapter ($0.00)
.venv/bin/python run_homelab_models_600.py --model qwen3-coder-30b-moe:latest --workers 4
PYTHONPATH=.:upstream .venv/bin/python -m harness.runner --release upstream --adapter sovereign_harness_krusch_stack:BenchmarkHarness

# 3. Official openai/gpt-5.6-sol grading + offline upstream archive check across all 14 archives
.venv/bin/python package_official_submissions.py --only gemma4_31b_stock --workers 12
PYTHONPATH=upstream .venv/bin/python -m harness.export_submission --release upstream --check submissions/sovereign_gemini_4_argon_low.zip

Inspect All 14 Official Archives, 8,400 Verified Traces & Wave-4 Open Weights

8 Queued dolphinbench.ai Archives · 91.17% Frontier Argon Low (#1) & 54.17% Gemma 4 31B @ $0.00 (#1 Open) · INV-STACK-10 2PC Harness

Return on Memory (Paper #27, 91.17%) → 🤗 HF Benchmark Dataset (14 Runs) → Interactive Arena (Tab 5) → ICLR 2026 BEAM 10M Paper →